1) Relate what was discussed in class or the text to the screening.
Citizen Kane a film a film written by Herman J. Mankiewicz and Orson Welles, which starred Orson Welles as a young, middle age and old man. The film as discussed in class won 9 Oscar nominations. Citizen Kane caused a little commotion before being released. It almost were not released and when it first got released it was a commercial failure. With the screening of the movie, it is hard to tell whether or not this film caused a controversy, but as a viewer what I couldn't understand was the importance of the movie and the reason behind why it was significant and highly rated in the movie (entertainment) industry. Knowing the background of the screening being based on the life of William Randolph Hearst helps a little in understanding the importance of the movie, meanwhile in all the accomplishments of the main character (Kane) all led to final failures. For example, the lost of all his wives, the lost of the election for governor, the unfinished home, the lost of his family, ect.
2) Find a related article (on the film, director, studio, actor/actress, artistic content, etc.) and summarize the content. You may use the library or the internet.
The article by Tim Dirks on Filmsite.com explains the success of the movie Citizen Kane, addressing the film as probably the world's most famous and highly rated film. The article going into more detailed of the controversy surrounding the films explains, it appeared to fictionalize and caricaturize certain events and individuals in the life of William Randolph Hearst and accused of drawing remarkable, unflattering, and uncomplimentary parallels (especially in regards to the Susan Alexander Kane character) to real-life. The confrontation with Hearst about the film being released in this article was better explain in his reasoning of why he was against the film and its first commercial failure. I learned that the gossip columnist Louella Parsons persuaded Hearst that he was being slandered by RKO and Orson Welles' film when it was first previewed, so the Hearst-owned newspapers (and other media outlets) pressured theatres to boycott the film and also threatened libel lawsuits. Hearst also ordered his publications to completely ignore the film, and not accept advertising for other RKO projects. He felt that he was being portrayed negatively in the film. Which is understandable to why he did not want it out in theatre.
3) Apply the article to the film screened in class. How did the article support or change the way you thought about the film, director, content, etc.?
The article allowed me to see the struggle and hardship it took to get the film on board with the public. By putting it on t.v, releasing it twice, showing it in the time period of after world war 2 and the booing from the audience of the nominations towards the films, the confrontation with Hearst and his news paper etc. all played a major role in the progressive and positive turn around of the films success.
4) Write a critical analysis of the film, including your personal opinion, formed as a result of the screening, class discussions, text material and the article.
By viewing the film I was unable to settle with the fact that this film is consider as one of the world's greatest film. It did not project to be a great film, but just a well put together "regular" movie. Yes, the story line was meaningful, meanwhile the essence of the main character failing at the majority of the significant aspect of his life is not a meaningful story line. The main character did not possess such importance that society would need to remember, such as being a governor or president. In conclusion the movie was well put together , but not something that I would call "one of the greatest".
http://www.filmsite.org/citi.html (ARTICLE)
CHECKLIST FOR PLAGIARISM 1) ( ) I have not handed in this assignment for any other class. 2) ( ) If I reused any information from other papers I have written for other classes, I clearly explain that in the paper. 3) ( ) If I used any passages word for word, I put quotations around those words, or used indentation and citation within the text. 4) ( ) I have not padded the bibliography. I have used all sources cited in the bibliography in the text of the paper. 5) ( ) I have cited in the bibliography only the pages I personally read. 6) ( ) I have used direct quotations only in cases where it could not be stated in another way. I cited the source within the paper and in the bibliography. 7) ( ) I did not so over-use direct quotations that the paper lacks interpretation or originality. 8) ( ) I checked yes on steps 1-7 and therefore have been fully transparent about the research and ideas used in my paper. Name: __________Kebeh Sando____________________________ Date: ____10/20/2015______________